FOR MODEL, AGENT, AND EVALUATION-DATA TEAMS
Evaluation tasks that reveal whether the work is actually correct.
Commission expert-authored environments for coding agents, document-grounded assistants, and tool-using systems. Define the capability gap; FAHALWAYS develops the assignments, working materials, reference outcomes, and scoring criteria.
Watch the two-minute pipeline exampleExplore the three-case pilotA successful run can still lose valid data
In our synthetic demonstration, a coding agent repairs a failed data pipeline. The job turns green, but 60 of 1,000 valid records disappear. The evaluation examines the resulting data, required behavior, and safe reruns.
Constructed demonstration. These figures illustrate the case; they are not measured results from a named model or client deployment.
Where we fit in your evaluation program
Task development
Build a focused set of tasks around the capabilities and failure modes your existing coverage does not adequately test.
Reference and scoring materials
Prepare expected deliverables, evidence-linked criteria, and reviewer guidance so completed work can be assessed consistently.
Reviewer and quality support
Scope rubric review, reference-output checks, ambiguity review, and reviewer calibration around your acceptance process.
Using the package with your tools
Your team runs its model or agent on the supplied assignment and source files. Reviewer materials remain separate. Delivery may include documents, spreadsheets, CSV datasets, and code as appropriate to the task.
Agree runtime requirements, dependencies, output schemas, and evaluator interfaces during scoping. Executable environments, automated checks, platform adapters, model runs, and findings reports are additional deliverables when included in the written scope. Compatibility with a particular evaluation platform is confirmed for the engagement.
Quality criteria agreed before development
- The assignment is answerable from the available evidence and permitted tools.
- Reference outcomes address the requested work and document material assumptions.
- Scoring criteria distinguish critical errors, partial progress, and successful completion.
- Source rights, case reuse, and distribution permissions are recorded in the agreement.
Start with three cases
Bring the system type, target capability, environment constraints, intended evaluation use, and acceptance requirements. We propose a three-case scope with deliverables, milestones, review rounds, and usage rights.
Request a pilot scopeReview pilot deliverablesComplete task files, reference solutions, and detailed scoring logic are shared privately under agreed terms.